Dermatitis · 2016 · 281 citations · 29 references
Life SciencesDermatologyImmunologyAllergyHypersensitivityOccupational DermatologyAllergic Skin DiseasesContact AllergyContact DermatitisPatch TestingContact Allergy EpidemiologyContact Dermatitis EpidemiologyPatch Test AllergensPatch Test InterpretationPatch Test ReadingsTest Frequencies
BACKGROUND: Patch testing is the most important diagnostic tool for the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: This study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch testing results from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014. METHODS: At 13 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a screening series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends were analyzed using χ test. RESULTS: A total of 4871 patients were tested. There were 3255 patients (66.8%) who had at least 1 positive reaction and 2412 patients (49.5%) who were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. A total of 434 patients (8.9%) had occupationally related skin disease. There were 9726 positive allergic reactions. Compared with the previous reporting periods (2011-2012 and 2001-2012, including at least three 2-year cycles), positive reaction rates for the top 25 screening allergens statistically increased for 2 allergens: methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (6.4%; risk ratios, 1.26 [1.07-1.50] and 2.08 [1.84-2.37]) and hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.6%; risk ratios, 1.34 [1.02-1.76] and 1.23 [1.00-1.51]). Methylisothiazolinone, which was added to the screening series for this 2013-2014 cycle, had the third highest positive reaction rate of allergens tested (10.9%). Four other newly added allergen preparations-formaldehyde 2% (7%), diphenylguanidine (3.8%), propylene glycol 100% (2.8%), and benzophenone-4 (2.1%)-all had reaction rates greater than 2%. Twenty-one percent of tested patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to an allergen not on the NACDG series; 14.6% of these were occupationally related. The T.R.U.E. TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark) would have hypothetically missed one quarter to one third of reactions detected by the NACDG screening series. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that the epidemic of sensitivity to methylisothiazolinone previously documented in Europe is also occurring in North America. Patch testing with allergens beyond a standard screening tray is necessary for the complete evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational allergic contact dermatitis.
29
Patch-Test Results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006
Kathryn A. Zug, Erin M. Warshaw, Joseph F. Fowler et al. · Dermatitis · 2009 · 295 citations
North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch-Test Results, 2001-2002 Study Period
Melanie D. Pratt, D. Belsito, Vincent A. DeLeo et al. · Dermatitis · 2004 · 265 citations
Life Sciences, Dermatology, Allergy +15
North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2009 to 2010
Erin M. Warshaw, D. Belsito, James S. Taylor et al. · Dermatitis · 2013 · 211 citations
Life Sciences, Dermatology, Allergy +16
North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2011–2012
Erin M. Warshaw, Howard I. Maibach, James S. Taylor et al. · Dermatitis · 2015 · 204 citations
Life Sciences, Dermatology, Allergy +13