Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Unraveling σ and π Effects on Magnetic Anisotropy in <i>cis</i>‐NiA<sub>4</sub>B<sub>2</sub> Complexes: Magnetization, HF‐HFEPR Studies, First‐Principles Calculations, and Orbital Modeling

17

Citations

32

References

2016

Year

Abstract

By using complementary experimental techniques and first-principles theoretical calculations, magnetic anisotropy in a series of five hexacoordinated nickel(II) complexes possessing a symmetry close to C<sub>2v</sub> , has been investigated. Four complexes have the general formula [Ni(bpy)X<sub>2</sub> ]<sup>n+</sup> (bpy=2,2'-bipyridine; X<sub>2</sub> =bpy (1), (NCS<sup>-</sup> )<sub>2</sub> (2), C<sub>2</sub> O<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> (3), NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> (4)). In the fifth complex, [Ni(HIM<sub>2</sub> -py)<sub>2</sub> (NO<sub>3</sub> )]<sup>+</sup> (5; HIM<sub>2</sub> -py=2-(2-pyridyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazolyl-1-hydroxy), which was reported previously, the two bpy bidentate ligands were replaced by HIM<sub>2</sub> -py. Analysis of the high-field, high-frequency electronic paramagnetic resonance (HF-HFEPR) spectra and magnetization data leads to the determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters. The D parameter, corresponding to the axial magnetic anisotropy, was negative (Ising type) for the five compounds and ranged from -1 to -10 cm<sup>-1</sup> . First-principles SO-CASPT2 calculations have been performed to estimate these parameters and rationalize the experimental values. From calculations, the easy axis of magnetization is in two different directions for complexes 2 and 3, on one hand, and 4 and 5, on the other hand. A new method is proposed to calculate the g tensor for systems with S=1. The spin Hamiltonian parameters (D (axial), E (rhombic), and g<sub>i</sub> ) are rationalized in terms of ordering of the 3 d orbitals. According to this orbital model, it can be shown that 1) the large magnetic anisotropy of 4 and 5 arises from splitting of the e<sub>g</sub> -like orbitals and is due to the difference in the σ-donor strength of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> and bpy or HIM<sub>2</sub> -py, whereas the difference in anisotropy between the two compounds is due to splitting of the t<sub>2g</sub> -like orbitals; and 2) the anisotropy of complexes 1-3 arises from the small splitting of the t<sub>2g</sub> -like orbitals. The direction of the anisotropy axis can be rationalized by the proposed orbital model.

References

YearCitations

Page 1