A randomized, controlled crossover study to discern the value of 360-degree versus traditional, faculty-only evaluation for performance improvement of anesthesiology residents

Abstract

Does a 360-degree evaluation, as compared to traditional, faculty-only evaluation afford anesthesiology residents greater potential for performance improvement? Sixteen residents were exposed to a prospective, single-blinded, crossover design study to determine the answer. For 360-degree evaluations, residents were rated according to the ACGME core competencies after adjusting to Program Director review of evaluations from self, faculty, nursing staff, medical students and patients.