Molecular Cancer Research · 2016 · 66 citations · 36 references
MedicineMolecular BiologyOncologyGene ExpressionMolecular OncologyProstate DiseaseNuclear ReceptorsProstate CancerSteroid Hormone SignalingAndrogen ReceptorsAnti-androgen ResistanceNuclear Localization SignalsReceptor Splice Variants
Androgen receptor splice variants (AR-V) are implicated in resistance of prostate cancer to androgen-directed therapies. When expressed alone in cells, some AR-Vs (e.g., AR-V7) localize primarily to the nucleus, whereas others (e.g., AR-V1, AR-V4, and AR-V6) localize mainly to the cytoplasm. Significantly, the latter are often coexpressed with the nucleus-predominant AR-Vs and the full-length AR (AR-FL). An important question to be addressed is whether the cytoplasmic-localized AR-Vs play a role in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) through interaction with the nucleus-predominant AR-Vs and AR-FL. Here, it is demonstrated that AR-V1, -V4, and -V6 can dimerize with both AR-V7 and AR-FL. Consequently, AR-V7 and androgen-bound AR-FL induced nuclear localization of AR-V1, -V4, and -V6, and these variants, in turn, mitigated the ability of the antiandrogen enzalutamide to inhibit androgen-induced AR-FL nuclear localization. Interestingly, the impact of nuclear localization of AR-V4 and -V6 on AR transactivation differs from that of AR-V1. Nuclear localization leads to an increased ability of AR-V4 and -V6 to transactivate both canonical AR targets and AR-V-specific targets and to confer castration-resistant cell growth. However, although AR-V1, which lacks inherent transcriptional activity, appears to activate AR-FL in an androgen-independent manner, it significantly antagonizes AR-V7 transactivation. Together, these data demonstrate that the complex interactions among different AR-Vs and AR-FL play a significant role in castration-resistant disease. IMPLICATIONS: This study suggests important consequences for clinical castration resistance due to simultaneous expression of AR-FL and AR-Vs in patient tumors and suggests that dissecting these interactions should help develop effective strategies to disrupt AR-V signaling. Mol Cancer Res; 15(1); 59-68. ©2016 AACR.
36
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2016 · 16.2K citations · Full text
Increased Survival with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer after Chemotherapy
Howard I. Scher, Karim Fizazi, Fred Saad et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 4.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +14
Abiraterone and Increased Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Johann S. de Bono, Christopher J. Logothetis, Arturo Molina et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 4.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening
Vanicha Vichai, Kanyawim Kirtikara · Nature Protocols · 2006 · 3.7K citations
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Dan R. Robinson, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Yi-Mi Wu et al. · Cell · 2015 · 3.6K citations · Full text