Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Preliminary Single-Center Canadian Experience of Human Normothermic Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion: Results of a Clinical Trial

200

Citations

28

References

2016

Year

TLDR

The study reports a preliminary single‑center North American experience with normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) liver technology. The authors procured ten donor livers (four donation after circulatory death), transplanted nine, and matched each NMP graft 1:3 with a static cold storage liver. The trial demonstrated that NMP is feasible and safe, with comparable liver function and 30‑day survival to static cold storage, but longer ICU and hospital stays and a technical failure in one graft highlight potential risks and the need for larger studies.

Abstract

After extensive experimentation, outcomes of a first clinical normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) liver trial in the United Kingdom demonstrated feasibility and clear safety, with improved liver function compared with standard static cold storage (SCS). We present a preliminary single-center North American experience using identical NMP technology. Ten donor liver grafts were procured, four (40%) from donation after circulatory death (DCD), of which nine were transplanted. One liver did not proceed because of a technical failure with portal cannulation and was discarded. Transplanted NMP grafts were matched 1:3 with transplanted SCS livers. Median NMP was 11.5 h (range 3.3-22.5 h) with one DCD liver perfused for 22.5 h. All transplanted livers functioned, and serum transaminases, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and lactate levels corrected in NMP recipients similarly to controls. Graft survival at 30 days (primary outcome) was not statistically different between groups on an intent-to-treat basis (p = 0.25). Intensive care and hospital stays were significantly more prolonged in the NMP group. This preliminary experience demonstrates feasibility as well as potential technical risks of NMP in a North American setting and highlights a need for larger, randomized studies.

References

YearCitations

Page 1