Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Biogas‐based denitrification in a biotrickling filter: Influence of nitrate concentration and hydrogen sulfide

47

Citations

38

References

2016

Year

Abstract

The feasibility of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> removal by the synergistic action of a prevailing denitrifying anoxic methane oxidising (DAMO), and nitrate-reducing and sulfide-oxidising bacterial (NR-SOB) consortium, using CH<sub>4</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> S from biogas as electron donors in a biotrickling filter was investigated. The influence of NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentration on N<sub>2</sub> O production during this process was also evaluated. The results showed that NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> was removed at rates up to 2.8 g m<sub>reactor</sub><sup>-3</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> using CH<sub>4</sub> as electron donor. N<sub>2</sub> O production rates correlated with NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentration in the liquid phase, with a 10-fold increase in N<sub>2</sub> O production as NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentration increased from 50 to 200 g m<sup>-3</sup> . The use of H<sub>2</sub> S as co-electron donor resulted in a 13-fold increase in NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> removal rates (∼18 gNO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> m<sup>-3</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> ) and complete denitrification under steady-state conditions, which was supported by higher abundances of narG, nirK, and nosZ denitrifying genes. Although the relative abundance of the DAMO population in the consortium was reduced from 60% to 13% after H<sub>2</sub> S addition, CH<sub>4</sub> removals were not compromised and H<sub>2</sub> S removal efficiencies of 100% were achieved. This study confirmed (i) the feasibility of co-oxidising CH<sub>4</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> S with denitrification, as well as (ii) the critical need to control NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> concentration to minimize N<sub>2</sub> O production by anoxic denitrifiers. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 665-673. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

References

YearCitations

Page 1