New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 543 citations · 13 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiovascular PharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyInterventional CardiologyCardiovascular DiseaseCoronary Artery DiseaseIschemic Heart DiseaseMyocardial Infarction ComplicationsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionStent PlacementClinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary StentingHazard Ratio ModelingPercutaneous Coronary Intervention CarePrimary Outcome AnalysisRepeat Revascularization
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the long-term effects of contemporary drug-eluting stents versus contemporary bare-metal stents on rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis and on quality of life. METHODS: We randomly assigned 9013 patients who had stable or unstable coronary artery disease to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the implantation of either contemporary drug-eluting stents or bare-metal stents. In the group receiving drug-eluting stents, 96% of the patients received either everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stents. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction after a median of 5 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included repeat revascularization, stent thrombosis, and quality of life. RESULTS: At 6 years, the rates of the primary outcome were 16.6% in the group receiving drug-eluting stents and 17.1% in the group receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88 to 1.09; P=0.66). There were no significant between-group differences in the components of the primary outcome. The 6-year rates of any repeat revascularization were 16.5% in the group receiving drug-eluting stents and 19.8% in the group receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.85; P<0.001); the rates of definite stent thrombosis were 0.8% and 1.2%, respectively (P=0.0498). Quality-of-life measures did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PCI, there were no significant differences between those receiving drug-eluting stents and those receiving bare-metal stents in the composite outcome of death from any cause and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction. Rates of repeat revascularization were lower in the group receiving drug-eluting stents. (Funded by the Norwegian Research Council and others; NORSTENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00811772 .).
13
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials
Donald E. Cutlip, Stephan Windecker, Roxana Mehran et al. · Circulation · 2007 · 5.4K citations
Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials
Roxana Mehran, Sunil V. Rao, Deepak L. Bhatt et al. · Circulation · 2011 · 4.4K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Hematology +10
John A. Spertus, Jennifer A. Winder, Timothy A. Dewhurst et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1995 · 1.4K citations
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes With Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Coronary Stents
Sripal Bangalore, Sunil Kumar, Nicholas Amoroso et al. · Circulation · 2012 · 569 citations