Publication | Open Access
Clinical utility of non‐invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies
66
Citations
13
References
2016
Year
NIPT should not be recommended for genetic evaluation of the etiology of ultrasound anomalies, as both resolution and sensitivity, or negative predictive value, are inferior to those of conventional karyotyping and microarray analysis. Nonetheless, some pregnant women consider NIPT to be an acceptable alternative to invasive diagnostic testing. © 2016 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1