Implant Dentistry · 2016 · 27 citations · 23 references
DentistryOrthopedic SurgeryProsthodonticsMechanical Behavior Of MaterialsProstheticsRemovable ProsthodonticsAbutment DesignRemoval TechniquesScrew-retained RestorationsTorque AnalysisAbutment Screw LooseningComparative Data AnalysisCyclic LoadingPrefabricated AbutmentsRemoval TorqueScrew Loosening AssessmentStock AbutmentsTorque
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the stability of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and prefabricated abutment by measuring removal torque before and after cyclic loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of fixture and 2 types of abutments were used. Removable torque was measured after cyclic loading for 5000 cycles between 25 and 250 N for each group. The same procedure was performed twice. RESULTS: First, removal torque values (Newton centimeter) were measured for stock versus custom abutments as follows: group 1: 27.17 versus 26.67, group 2: 26.27 versus 26.33, and group 3: 37.33 versus 36.67. Second removal torque values (Newton centimeter) were also measured: group 1: 23 versus 23.5, group 2: 22.5 versus 22.33, and group 3: 32.67 versus 32.5. There was no significant difference between the stock and custom abutments in either the first or second removal torque values and also no significant difference among initial tightening torque, first or second removal torque (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: With precise control of CAD/CAM abutments, good screw joint stability can be achieved.
23
Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
James E. Haack, Ronald L. Sakaguchi, Ting Sun et al. · PubMed · 1995 · 319 citations
Dentistry, Implant Dentistry, Mechanical Behavior Of Materials +12
Charles H. Gibbs, Parker E. Mahan, André P. Mauderli et al. · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 1986 · 300 citations
Dentistry, Orthodontics, Mechanical Properties Of Dental Materials +10