Communications of the Association for Information Systems · 2011 · 10 citations · 27 references
The relationship between Information Systems (IS) scholars and IS practitioners has been debated since the birth of the IS discipline. How are academics interacting with practice, and how should we? In this article we propose that academia-practice collaboration, namely “mutual informing,” is an existential aspect of the Information Systems field. This article is based on presentations, discussions, group work, and a debate that took place during the Fifth Kristiansand International Workshop on Information Systems Research (KIWISR), held at University of Agder in Kristiansand, Norway. The theme of KIWISR-5 was “For Whom Do We Toil? Mutual Informing Between Academia and Practice.” As a synthesis of the workshop, we propose that mutual informing consists of, at least, topics such as choice of publication outlets, facilitation of collaboration, roles in research process, and delivery of teaching. Further, we suggest that mutual informing is concerned with transferring and transforming knowledge between the realms of design and development, use, and management of Information Systems. The biggest challenges to mutual informing are the different knowledge interests and timeframes between the realms of academia and practice.
27
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Maurice Bloch, Jean Lave, Étienne Wenger · Man · 1994 · 39.8K citations
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, March March, Jinsoo Park et al. · MIS Quarterly · 2004 · 9.4K citations
Design science in information systems research
Alan R. Hevner, Salvatore T. March, Jinsoo Park et al. · MIS Quarterly · 2004 · 7.7K citations
Information Systems, Education, Information Technology Management +16