Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment · 2016 · 26 citations · 19 references
MedicineRadiation OncologyMetastasisNeuro-oncologyTreatment PlanningBrain MetastasesBrain MetastasisBrain Metastasis ManagementMetastatic Brain TumorsThree-dimensional Conformal RadiotherapyHomogeneity IndexIntracranial MetastasesPlan Evaluation MetricsPlan Quality AssessmentPlan Quality MetricsVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Dose PrescriptionVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy DosimetryVolumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning
Background: In this treatment planning study, we compare the plan quality and delivery parameters for the treatment of multiple brain metastases using 2 monoisocentric techniques: the Multiple Metastases Element from Brainlab and the RapidArc volumetric-modulated arc therapy from Varian Medical Systems. Methods: Eight patients who were treated in our institution for multiple metastases (3-7 lesions) were replanned with Multiple Metastases Element using noncoplanar dynamic conformal arcs. The same patients were replanned with the RapidArc technique in Eclipse using 4 noncoplanar arcs. Both techniques were designed using a single isocenter. Plan quality metrics (conformity index, homogeneity index, gradient index, and R 50% ), monitor unit, and the planning time were recorded. Comparison of the Multiple Metastases Element and RapidArc plans was performed using Shapiro-Wilk test, paired Student t test, and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: A paired Wilcoxon signed rank test between Multiple Metastases Element and RapidArc showed comparable plan quality metrics and dose to brain. Mean ± standard deviation values of conformity index were 1.8 ± 0.7 and 1.7 ± 0.6, homogeneity index were 1.3 ± 0.1 and 1.3 ± 0.1, gradient index were 5.0 ± 1.8 and 5.1 ± 1.9, and R 50% were 4.9 ± 1.8 and 5.0 ± 1.9 for Multiple Metastases Element and RapidArc plans, respectively. Mean brain dose was 2.3 and 2.7 Gy for Multiple Metastases Element and RapidArc plans, respectively. The mean value of monitor units in Multiple Metastases Element plan was 7286 ± 1065, which is significantly lower than the RapidArc monitor units of 9966 ± 1533 ( P < .05). Conclusion: For the planning of multiple brain lesions to be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, Multiple Metastases Element planning software produced equivalent conformity, homogeneity, dose falloff, and brain V 12 Gy but required significantly lower monitor units, when compared to RapidArc plans.
19
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team · 2000 · 353K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Computer Science, Statistical Computing +10
Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101
Stanley Benedict, Kamil M. Yenice, D Followill et al. · Medical Physics · 2010 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc
Karl F. Otto · Medical Physics · 2007 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Clinical Radiation Oncology +16
Edward Shaw, Charles Scott, Luís Souhami et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2000 · 1.6K citations