Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2016 · 35 citations · 20 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryClinical CardiologyElectrophysiologyAortic StenosisCardiac PacingCardiac Valve SurgeryHeart FailureSurgical Valve ReplacementTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAtrioventricular Block PacingCardiac PacemakersConduction Disturbances After Valve InterventionPacemaker MalfunctionPerioperative Pacemaker ManagementPermanent Pacemaker TherapyPostoperative Conduction DisturbancesValve Replacement Indications
OBJECTIVES: In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a sutureless Perceval prosthesis (SU-AVR) can be performed instead of conventional AVR or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Little data are available regarding postoperative conduction disorders after SU-AVR. We aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of new-onset complete atrioventricular block (NO-AVB) requiring permanent cardiac stimulation following SU-AVR. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients who underwent SU-AVR between 2013 and 2015. Early patients underwent partial aortic decalcification and subannular valve implantation (standard technique), while later patients underwent complete/symmetrical decalcification and intra-annular valve deployment (modified technique). Predictive baseline and procedural variables and electrocardiographic parameters were identified using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: We included 140 patients (mean age, 78 ± 6.5 years; mean Log EuroSCORE II, 8.9 ± 10%; 28.6% concomitant myocardial revascularization). The most common postoperative conduction disturbances were LBBB (25%), NO-AVB (12.1%) and first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) (7.9%). The incidence of NO-AVB was 61% lower with the modified versus the standard technique (P= 0.04). NO-AVB predominantly appeared within 24 h post-surgery, occurring >24 h post-surgery in only 2 patients (both with baseline conduction defects). Independent predictors of NO-AVB included baseline left QRS axis deviation (LaQD; P= 0.03), first-degree AVB (P< 0.01) and standard surgical technique (P= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NO-AVB is a frequent complication following SU-AVR, and its incidence strongly depends on the surgical technique. Baseline first-degree AVB and LaQD independently predict NO-AVB and should be considered when deciding the duration of postoperative electrocardiographic monitoring.
20
Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
Craig R. Smith, Martin B. Leon, Michael J. Mack et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 6.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +13
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary
Rick A. Nishimura, Catherine M Otto, Robert O. Bonow et al. · Circulation · 2014 · 2.6K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +16
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry
Ralf Zahn, Ulrich Gerckens, E. Grube et al. · European Heart Journal · 2010 · 596 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +11
Malakh Shrestha, Theodore Fischlein, Bart Meuris et al. · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2015 · 186 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +8