Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · 2002 · 29 citations · 0 references
Streambank FencingWildlife EcologyDirect DisturbanceAnimal ScienceHabitat LossAnimal ManagementWildlife ManagementWildlife BiologyRiver RestorationLivestock GrazingHabitat ManagementPasture Stream ZonesConservation Biology
Grazing livestock in streams and associated riparian zones may negatively impact a variety of wildlife through direct disturbance and alteration of environmental conditions. To evaluate streambank fencing as a management tool, we measured the richness, abundance, and biomass of reptile and amphibian species on 10 grazed streams and associated riparian areas and 10 similar areas that were recently fenced (1-2 yrs) to exclude livestock, during spring and summer of 1998 and 1999. Effects of streambank fencing on vegetation, water quality, and macroinvertebrate populations also were examined because livestock grazing may indirectly impact communities of herpetofauna through their influence on these factors. We found no difference in species richness, abundance of all species combined, or biomass of herpetofauna between fenced and unfenced streams. However, northern queen snakes (Regina septemvittata) and eastern garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) were more abundant on fenced than unfenced sites. Percent litter cover and vertical obstruction were higher on fenced sites, terrestrial macroinvertebrate biomass was greater on unfenced sites, and water-quality variables did not differ between site types. Although some species (e.g., birds) responded quickly ( 4 yrs). The length of time since livestock were excluded, dispersal ability, reproductive potential, and distance to the nearest remnant population may be important factors in reptile and amphibian recovery in grazed stream and riparian zones.