SAGE Open · 2016 · 10 citations · 72 references
Social SciencesPsychologySocial PsychologyItem Response TheoryPsychometricsSelfMulticultural AssessmentPsychological AssessmentPsychological TestingTest ReliabilityAssessment With Diverse PopulationsCoefficient AlphaCross-cultural Measurement EquivalenceCross-cultural Scale EquivalenceCross-cultural Scale ValidationPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric ReliabilityReliability Coefficient Estimation
A reliability generalization was conducted on studies that reported use of the Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA), published between 1987 and 2013. For inclusion in this meta-analysis, each study had to have reported a Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for its sample. Data from 83 Cronbach’s alpha coefficients representing 12,992 participants were analyzed; only 67 out of 193 published studies (43.52%) reported reliability scores for their sample. The reliability scores produced by the SL-ASIA ranged from .62 to .96 with an average of .91 ( SD = 0.07); therefore, all of the reported reliability scores for this instrument were in the acceptable to excellent range. Our results demonstrate that SL-ASIA continues to be an instrument with strong psychometric properties when used with diverse populations, and it is therefore appropriate for continued use with studies on acculturation.
72
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · PubMed · 2009 · 45.1K citations · Full text