World Journal of Surgery · 2016 · 76 citations · 13 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryMetastasisPain ManagementPain MedicineBone MetastasisBone Metastasis PalliationCancer PainMetastatic Bone DiseaseMetastatic Disease TreatmentRadiation TherapyBone Metastases ManagementBone Metastasis Pain ControlBone Metastasis Response AssessmentBone Metastasis TherapyBone Pain In CancerBone Pain PalliationMetastatic Bone Disease Management
INTRODUCTION: Bone metastatic disease is a major cause of pain and decreased quality of life in patients with cancer. In addition to systemic therapy and pain control with narcotic analgesics, standard local treatments include palliation with radiation therapy and surgery. However, 20-30 % of patients do not respond to conventional treatments, increasing the interest in alternative therapies. We present the results of a new minimally invasive technique in the treatment of bone metastases. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients affected by painful bone metastases were treated with electrochemotherapy (ECT) from July 2009 to July 2011; the mean age was 60 years (range 37-87); 21 patients received a previous ineffective local treatment; the appendicular skeleton was affected in 15 patients while in 14 patients other sites were involved. ECT was performed using the Cliniporator Vitae under fluoroscopy or CT guidance depending on the site of the lesion. Clinical response was assessed using VAS scale and objective tumour response was evaluated according to the MD Anderson criteria for bone metastases. RESULTS: All patients well tolerated the procedure and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. At a mean follow-up of 7 months, 24 patients were available for evaluation. 84 % of the patients (20 out of 24) referred improvement of pain ≥50 % with reduction of narcotics consumption. Radiographic evaluation after 3 months in 20 evaluable patients, showed "partial response" in 1 patient, "stable disease" in 17 and "progression" in two cases. DISCUSSION: Results reported in this study demonstrated ECT to be safe and feasible in the treatment of painful bone metastases even when other previous treatments were ineffective. Pain and disease progression control was achieved in the majority of the patients with consequent improvement of quality of life. CONCLUSION: ECT should be considered a new feasible tool in the treatment of bone metastases in place or in combination with standard treatments; further developments are required to extend the use of this technique to spine metastases.
13
M. Marty, Gregor Serša, Jean Rémi Garbay et al. · European Journal of Cancer Supplements · 2006 · 891 citations
Medicine, Dermatology, Oncology +10
Lluis M. Mir, Julie Gehl, Gregor Serša et al. · European Journal of Cancer Supplements · 2006 · 593 citations
Medicine, Pharmacology, Surgery +7
The Effect of Irreversible Electroporation on Blood Vessels
Elad Maor, Antoni Ivorra, Jonathan Leor et al. · Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment · 2007 · 364 citations
Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST
Colleen M. Costelloe, Hubert H. Chuang, John E. Madewell et al. · Journal of Cancer · 2010 · 267 citations · Full text