Do Constitutional Rights Make a Difference?

Adam Chilton, Mila Versteeg

American Journal of Political Science · 2015 · 118 citations · 67 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Although the importance of constitutional rights is widely recognized, it remains unclear whether they influence government behavior, especially since organizational rights may be more effective than individual rights. The study tests the effectiveness of six political rights, hypothesizing that organizational rights—such as unionization and party formation—enhance de facto rights protection more than individual rights. The authors analyze constitutional rights data from 186 countries using various statistical techniques. The analysis confirms that organizational rights are linked to higher de facto rights protection, whereas individual rights show no such association.

Abstract

Although the question of whether constitutional rights matter is of great theoretical and practical importance, little is known about whether constitutional rights impact government behavior. In this article, we test the effectiveness of six political rights. We hypothesize that a difference exists between organizational rights—most notably, the rights to unionize and form political parties—and individual rights. Specifically, we suggest that organizational rights increase de facto rights protection because they create organizations with the incentives and means to protect the underlying right, which renders these rights self‐enforcing. Such organizations are not necessarily present to protect individual rights, which could make individual rights less effective. We test our theory using a variety of statistical methods on a data set of constitutional rights for 186 countries. The results support our theory: Organizational rights are associated with increased de facto rights protection, while individual rights are not.

References

67