The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · 2016 · 24 citations · 16 references
ComputingEarth SciencesGeoinformaticsGeospatial Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningRemote SensingGeospatial Machine LearningRemote Sensing Image AnalysisRock ClassificationSupport Vector MachinesClassification Accuracy AssessmentGeological InterpretationGeological MappingMineral ExplorationNaive BayesNaive Bayes ClassificationRandom Forest ClassificationSupport Vector Machine Classification
Abstract. Remotely sensed spectral imagery, geophysical (magnetic and gravity), and geodetic (elevation) data are useful in a variety of Earth science applications such as environmental monitoring and mineral exploration. Using these data with Machine Learning Algorithms (MLA), which are widely used in image analysis and statistical pattern recognition applications, may enhance preliminary geological mapping and interpretation. This approach contributes towards a rapid and objective means of geological mapping in contrast to conventional field expedition techniques. In this study, four supervised MLAs (naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbour, random forest, and support vector machines) are compared in order to assess their performance for correctly identifying geological rocktypes in an area with complete ground validation information. Geological maps of the Sudbury region are used for calibration and validation. Percent of correct classifications was used as indicators of performance. Results show that random forest is the best approach. As expected, MLA performance improves with more calibration clusters, i.e. a more uniform distribution of calibration data over the study region. Performance is generally low, though geological trends that correspond to a ground validation map are visualized. Low performance may be the result of poor spectral images of bare rock which can be covered by vegetation or water. The distribution of calibration clusters and MLA input parameters affect the performance of the MLAs. Generally, performance improves with more uniform sampling, though this increases required computational effort and time. With the achievable performance levels in this study, the technique is useful in identifying regions of interest and identifying general rocktype trends. In particular, phase I geological site investigations will benefit from this approach and lead to the selection of sites for advanced surveys.
16
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 40.5K citations · Full text
Corinna Cortes, Vladimir Vapnik · Machine Learning · 1995 · 33K citations · Full text
Fei Yuan, Kali E. Sawaya, Brian C. Loeffelholz et al. · Remote Sensing of Environment · 2005 · 1.2K citations