Publication | Closed Access
The ups and downs of being lesbian, gay, and bisexual: A daily experience perspective on minority stress and support processes.
78
Citations
33
References
2015
Year
HomosexualityEducationQueer TheoryMental HealthSupport ProcessesPsychologySocial SciencesGender IdentityGender StudiesDaily Experience PerspectiveDaily Diary MethodsMinority StressLgb PeopleSocial IdentityPsychiatryIntersectionalitySexual DiversitySocial StressPsychosocial ResearchQueer StudiesSociologySexual IdentityHeterosexual PeopleBisexualitySexual OrientationLgbtq+ Mental HealthPsychopathology
Daily diary methods were used to explore identity-related stress and support processes as they occurred from day-to-day in a sample of 61 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) young adults. At the end of each day for 7-10 consecutive days, participants reported on daily identity-salient experiences (ISEs), proximal minority stressors (internalized stigma, expectations of rejection), and affect (positive, negative). A multilevel latent covariate model was used to examine within- and between-person interrelations among these variables. Participants described a variety of positive and negative ISEs with both heterosexual and LGB people. These ISEs accounted for change in affect from 1 day to the next, even controlling for positive and negative experiences unrelated to identity. For example, relative to the previous day, participants experienced increases in positive affect on days featuring positive ISEs with both heterosexual people and LGB people. ISEs also predicted daily proximal stress variables, and findings differed at the 2 levels of analysis. For example, at the within-person level, participants experienced decreases in internalized stigma on days featuring positive ISEs with heterosexuals. At the between-person level, however, findings indicated that participants who generally had the highest levels of internalized stigma were more likely than others to report negative ISEs with LGB people and less likely to report positive ISEs with LGB people. Finally, proximal stress variables predicted affect at the within-person level: Affect improved on days when levels of internalized stigma and expected rejection were lower than usual. (PsycINFO Database Record
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1