Journal of natural resources and life sciences education · 2008 · 30 citations · 14 references
Natural SciencesAgronomyBiostatisticsExperimental DesignMeta-analysisStatisticsData AnalysisDescriptive StatisticsHypothesis TestingStatistical AnalysisStatistical SignificanceStudy DesignAnova-based ComparisonBetween-group ComparisonJournal LiteratureLeast Significant Difference TestMultiple Hypothesis TestingMultiple-comparison TestMultiple-treatment ComparisonStatistical Significance Testing
This article reviews and discusses the use of statistical concepts in a natural resources and life sciences journal on the basis of a census of the articles published in a recent issue of the Agronomy Journal and presents a flow chart and a graph that display the inter‐relationships between the most commonly used statistical terms. It also discusses the use of contrasts between treatment means for testing ideas that the experimental work is designed to test, and points out that the use of a multiple comparison procedure is appropriate only when such ideas are absent or very vague. In the latter case, use of the unrestricted least significant difference procedure is recommended, with the proviso that it be used as an hypothesis generating method, not a method for simultaneous formulation and testing of hypotheses.
14
No Adjustments Are Needed for Multiple Comparisons
Kenneth J. Rothman · Epidemiology · 1990 · 5.8K citations
Error bars in experimental biology
Geoff Cumming, Fiona Fidler, David L. Vaux · The Journal of Cell Biology · 2007 · 914 citations · Full text