Publication | Open Access
Somatic mutations predict outcomes of hypomethylating therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome
68
Citations
34
References
2016
Year
Hmt AgentsGeneticsGenetic EpidemiologyImmunologyPathologyEpigeneticsGenetic MedicineAplastic AnemiaClinical GeneticsMyeloid NeoplasiaHematological MalignancyHematologyClinical TrialsMolecular DiagnosticsMolecular OncologyVariant InterpretationHealth SciencesCandidate Mds GenesInherited Metabolic DiseaseDeep SequencingMolecular MedicineMyelodysplastic SyndromeSomatic MutationsSomatic VariantGenetic DisorderMalignant Blood DisorderMedical GeneticsMedicine
Although hypomethylating therapy (HMT) is the first line therapy in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), predicting response to HMT remains an unresolved issue. We aimed to identify mutations associated with response to HMT and survival in MDS. A total of 107 Korean patients with MDS who underwent HMT (57 responders and 50 non-responders) were enrolled. Targeted deep sequencing (median depth of coverage 1,623X) was performed for 26 candidate MDS genes. In multivariate analysis, no mutation was significantly associated with response to HMT, but a lower hemoglobin level (<10g/dL, OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.22-10.33) and low platelet count (<50,000/μL, OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.05-5.93) were independent markers of poor response to HMT. In the subgroup analysis by type of HMT agents, U2AF1 mutation was significantly associated with non-response to azacitidine, which was consistent in multivariate analysis (OR 14.96, 95% CI 1.67-134.18). Regarding overall survival, mutations in DNMT1 (P=0.031), DNMT3A (P=0.006), RAS (P=0.043), and TP53 (P=0.008), and two clinical variables (male-gender, P=0.002; IPSS-R H/VH, P=0.026) were independent predicting factors of poor prognosis. For AML-free survival, mutations in DNMT3A (P<0.001), RAS (P=0.001), and TP53 (P=0.047), and two clinical variables (male-gender, P=0.024; IPSS-R H/VH, P=0.005) were independent predicting factors of poor prognosis. By combining these mutations and clinical predictors, we developed a quantitative scoring model for response to azacitidine, overall- and AML-free survival. Response to azacitidine and survival rates became worse significantly with increasing risk-scores. This scoring model can make prognosis prediction more reliable and clinically applicable.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1