Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

References

Page 1

	Year	Citations
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations Gordon Guyatt, Andrew D Oxman, Gunn Elisabeth Vist, BMJ EngineeringEducationResearch EvaluationResearch EthicsRating Quality	2008	20.6K
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration Jan P. Vandenbroucke Annals of Internal Medicine	2007	3.4K
Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials An‐Wen Chan, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Mette T. Haahr, JAMA	2004	1.8K
H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1. Wolfgang Viechtbauer Psychometrika	2007	1.3K
Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials Henry S. Sacks, Jayne Berrier, Dinah Reitman, New England Journal of Medicine Randomized Controlled TrialsIndividual ItemsClinical TrialsRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Outcomes	1987	1.3K
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) ReliabilityEngineeringDiagnostic TestDiagnostic CriterionPatient Safety	2003	1.2K
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews David Moher, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Andrea C. Tricco, PLoS Medicine	2007	878
The Medical Review Article: State of the Science Cynthia D. Mulrow Annals of Internal Medicine Medical EthicsHealth PolicyAlternative MedicinePatient SafetyEvidence-based Medicine	1987	857
Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables Douglas G. Altman BMJ	2001	754
Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making John N. Lavis, Huw Davies, Andy Oxman, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy	2005	585

Page 1