A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples

TLDR

Research on stress and coping has largely focused on individuals, leaving couples and systemic, everyday stress largely unexplored, and existing family‑stress models are limited to major life events and rarely address dyadic coping. This article proposes a new systemic‑transactional model of stress and coping processes in intimate relationships. The model discusses various forms of couple stress, introduces a taxonomy of dyadic coping—common, supportive, and delegated—and outlines factors that influence whether dyadic coping is enacted.

Abstract

Until recently, research on stress and coping has primarily focused on the individual, where we find a large body of theoretical and empirical work. On the other hand, there are far fewer empirical, and nearly no theoretical, approaches to these phenomena in couples. Stress in couples and forms of dyadic coping in a systemic view have largely been neglected as topics and have not yet attracted the attention of many psychologists. Although some models exist for family stress and family coping in regard to critical life events and transitions and thus may be applied in the context of dyadic intimate relationships as well, most of these approaches have several weaknesses: (1) Their utility concerning every day stress and daily hassles is limited. (2) Furthermore, stress and coping are seldom discussed as a systemic phenomenon, but rather as individual affairs. (3) Theoretical conceptualizations are generally rare. In this article, I will try to clarify stress and coping from a systemic and transactional point of view by proposing a new model of stress and coping processes in intimate relationships. In addition to a discussion of different forms of stress in couples, we will present a taxonomy of different coping forms: common dyadic coping, supportive dyadic coping and delegated dyadic coping. Moreover, factors determining whether dyadic coping is practiced or not will be outlined.