SPE Journal · 2016 · 57 citations · 27 references
EngineeringEarth SciencesPetroleum EngineeringComputational Fluid DynamicsReservoir EngineeringReservoir SimulationFinite Element FormulationFinite Volume MethodsFinite Volume Reservoir SimulationGrid AdaptationMultiscale Finite Element MethodsNumerical ConvergenceFinite Volume DiscretizationFlow In Heterogeneous Porous MediaGalerkin ProjectionHeterogeneous Porous MediaMass ConservationModel ReductionMultiscale Finite Element AnalysisReduced-order Multiscale Modeling
Summary We present a global/local model reduction for fast multiscale reservoir simulations in highly heterogeneous porous media. Our approach identifies a low-dimensional structure in the solution space. We introduce an auxiliary variable (the velocity field) in our model reduction that achieves a high compression of the model. This compression is achieved because the velocity field is conservative for any low-order reduced model in our framework, whereas a typical global model reduction that is based on proper-orthogonal-decomposition (POD) Galerkin projection cannot guarantee local mass conservation. The lack of mass conservation can be observed in numerical simulations that use finite-volume-based approaches. The discrete empirical interpolation method (DEIM) approximates fine-grid nonlinear functions in Newton iterations. This approach delivers an online computational cost that is independent of the fine-grid dimension. POD snapshots are inexpensively computed with local model-reduction techniques that are based on the generalized multiscale finite-element method (GMsFEM) that provides (1) a hierarchical approximation of the snapshot vectors, (2) adaptive computations with coarse grids, and (3) inexpensive global POD operations in small dimensional spaces on a coarse grid. By balancing the errors of the global and local reduced-order models, our new methodology provides an error bound in simulations. Our numerical results, by use of a two-phase immiscible flow, show a substantial speedup, and we compare our results with the standard POD-DEIM in a finite-volume setup.
27