Biotechnology Progress · 2016 · 82 citations · 24 references
EngineeringBiotechnologyManufacturing EngineeringLife Cycle AssessmentManufacturing ProcessesUpstream ProcessingLife Cycle Inventory AnalysisLife-cycle CostingLifecycle AssessmentManufacturing Cost AnalysisManufacturing Of Monoclonal AntibodiesProcess Scale-upEnvironmental Life Cycle AssessmentManufacturing Life Cycle AssessmentProcess Water DemandProcess Water UseProduct Life Cycle AssessmentScale-up ProductionSustainable Manufacturing ProcessesWater Consumption Management
Life‑cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies environmental impacts such as water, energy, and waste, but its use in bioprocessing remains limited. The study aims to design a more cost‑efficient, robust, and environmentally friendly mAb manufacturing process by integrating LCA, economic analysis, sensitivity analysis, and scale‑up. The authors evaluate this framework through a comparative analysis of fed‑batch and perfusion upstream configurations, assessing their environmental and economic performance. The framework shows that a standard 4‑day perfusion process has similar cost of goods to fed‑batch but a 35 % higher water use, 17 % higher energy use, and 17 % higher CO₂ emissions, while extending perfusion pooling to 8 days can reduce its environmental footprint. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol.
Life-cycle assessment (LCA) is an environmental assessment tool that quantifies the environmental impact associated with a product or a process (e.g., water consumption, energy requirements, and solid waste generation). While LCA is a standard approach in many commercial industries, its application has not been exploited widely in the bioprocessing sector. To contribute toward the design of more cost-efficient, robust and environmentally-friendly manufacturing process for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a framework consisting of an LCA and economic analysis combined with a sensitivity analysis of manufacturing process parameters and a production scale-up study is presented. The efficiency of the framework is demonstrated using a comparative study of the two most commonly used upstream configurations for mAb manufacture, namely fed-batch (FB) and perfusion-based processes. Results obtained by the framework are presented using a range of visualization tools, and indicate that a standard perfusion process (with a pooling duration of 4 days) has similar cost of goods than a FB process but a larger environmental footprint because it consumed 35% more water, demanded 17% more energy, and emitted 17% more CO2 than the FB process. Water consumption was the most important impact category, especially when scaling-up the processes, as energy was required to produce process water and water-for-injection, while CO2 was emitted from energy generation. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the perfusion process can be made more environmentally-friendly than the FB process if the pooling duration is extended to 8 days. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 32:1324-1335, 2016.
24
US Environmental Protection Agency
Choice Reviews Online · 1998 · 5.9K citations
Public Affairs, Environmental Policy, Environmental Sciences +6
The E Factor: fifteen years on
Roger A. Sheldon · Green Chemistry · 2007 · 1.6K citations
Concepción Jiménez‐González, Celia S. Ponder, Quirinus B. Broxterman et al. · Organic Process Research & Development · 2011 · 860 citations
Integrated continuous production of recombinant therapeutic proteins
Veena Warikoo, Rahul Godawat, Kevin Brower et al. · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · 2012 · 419 citations