The Lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016 · 261 citations · 20 references
PharmacyPharmacologyPharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyGastrointestinal PharmacotherapyMucosal ImmunologyAnti-inflammatory PharmacologyCrohn Disease PharmacotherapyGastrointestinal InflammationInflammatory Bowel DiseaseInflammatory Disease PharmacotherapyUlcerative Colitis PharmacotherapyAcute Severe Ulcerative ColitisClinical Effectiveness MeasurementComparative Clinical EffectivenessContinuous Infusion PharmacologyContinuous Subcutaneous InfusionInflammatory Bowel Disease TherapyRelative Effectiveness Estimation
BACKGROUND: Infliximab and ciclosporin are of similar efficacy in treating acute severe ulcerative colitis, but there has been no comparative evaluation of their relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: In this mixed methods, open-label, pragmatic randomised trial, we recruited consenting patients aged 18 years or older at 52 district general and teaching hospitals in England, Scotland, and Wales who had been admitted, unscheduled, with severe ulcerative colitis and failed to respond to intravenous hydrocortisone within about 5 days. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either infliximab (5 mg/kg intravenous infusion given over 2 h at baseline, and again at 2 weeks and 6 weeks after the first infusion) or ciclosporin (2 mg/kg per day by continuous infusion for up to 7 days, followed by twice-daily tablets delivering 5·5 mg/kg per day for 12 weeks). Randomisation used a web-based password-protected site, with a dynamic algorithm to generate allocations on request, thus protecting against investigator preference or other subversion, while ensuring that each trial group was balanced by centre, which was the only stratification used. Local investigators and participants were aware of the treatment allocated, but the chief investigator and analysts were masked. Analysis was by treatment allocated. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted survival-ie, the area under the curve (AUC) of scores from the Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis Questionnaire (CUCQ) completed by participants at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, then every 6 months from 1 year to 3 years. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN22663589. FINDINGS: none in the ciclosporin group). INTERPRETATION: There was no significant difference between ciclosporin and infliximab in clinical effectiveness. FUNDING: NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme.
20
Infliximab for Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis
Paul Rutgeerts, William J. Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Cortisone in Ulcerative Colitis
S. C. Truelove, L. J. Witts · BMJ · 1955 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Immunology, Pathobiology +12
Cyclosporine in Severe Ulcerative Colitis Refractory to Steroid Therapy
Simon Lichtiger, D. H. Present, Asher Kornbluth et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1994 · 1.7K citations