Simultaneous myocardial revascularization and aortic valve replacement: stentless versus stented bioprostheses.

Abstract

Implantation of stentless aortic valve prostheses is more time-consuming than implantation of conventional stented bioprostheses. Simultaneous myocardial revascularization can result in a considerably prolonged operation time. We reviewed our patients with regard to surgical aspects in the specific patient cohorts. From April 1996 to April 1999, 303 patients were operated for aortic valve disease with or without concomitant coronary artery revascularization. Mean age was 75 years, ranging between 36 and 90 years. Using the Medtronic Freestyle valve, the following techniques of implantation were used: subcoronary technique, 163 patients, 61.5%; root inclusion technique, 7 patients, 3.5%; total root replacement, 30 patients, 15%. Total hospital mortality rate was 5.6%, reflecting age and concomitant disease of these patients. For isolated aortic valve replacement, the mortality rate was 4.7% and 6.7% for combined procedures. Coronary artery patients who are not suitable for stentless valve implantation owing to extensive aortic root calcification have a higher perioperative mortality rate. Compared with the isolated valve replacement and despite more extensive surgery and prolonged operative time, simultaneous myocardial revascularization in patients with stentless prostheses implantation can be performed without an increased risk.