Stroke rehabilitation: evaluation of its quality by assessing patient outcomes.

Abstract

A modified version of an outcome-oriented quality-assurance system was used to assess the care received by patients, aged 21 to 60 years, with completed stroke, who had participated for at least three weeks in a rehabilitation program. Care for 110 patients was evaluated by comparing actual results with a set of standards for outcomes produced by practicing rehabilitation professionals using small-group estimation techniques. Outcomes were better than estimated, standards having indicated that 29% of patients should be capable of self-care, while actually 43% were. When 50 of the 110 outcomes were individually investigated; only 5% of the total study population were probably not functioning at an optimal level, and 3% more might reach optimal functioning if existing follow-up procedures were extended and made more routine. Since only an estimated 3 to 6 cases per year would be affected, the cost of instituting such care would not be justified. Participants concluded that assessment of outcomes justified continuation on the existing processes for stroke rehabilitation.