Water Environment Research · 2011 · 180 citations · 31 references
EngineeringBiological EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringBioprocess EngineeringBioreactor DesignWastewater TreatmentActivated Sludge ProcessBiological Treatment ProcessesBioreactor OperationIndustrial Wastewater TreatmentSludge TreatmentWastewater BiotreatmentAutotrophic Nitrogen RemovalBiofilm ProcessesBiofilm-based Nitrogen RemovalBiological Nitrogen RemovalMoving Bed Biofilm ReactorsNitrogen Oxide RemovalSludge ValorizationWastewater Bioreactors
The moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) can operate as a 2- (anoxic) or 3-(aerobic) phase system with buoyant free-moving plastic biofilm carriers. These systems can be used for municipal and industrial wastewater treatment, aquaculture, potable water denitrification, and, in roughing, secondary, tertiary, and sidestream applications. The system includes a submerged biofilm reactor and liquid-solids separation unit. The MBBR process benefits include the following: (1) capacity to meet treatment objectives similar to activated sludge systems with respect to carbon-oxidation and nitrogen removal, but requires a smaller tank volume than a clarifier-coupled activated sludge system; (2) biomass retention is clarifier-independent and solids loading to the liquid-solids separation unit is reduced significantly when compared with activated sludge systems; (3) the MBBR is a continuous-flow process that does not require a special operational cycle for biofilm thickness, L(F), control (e.g., biologically active filter backwashing); and (4) liquid-solids separation can be achieved with a variety of processes, including conventional and compact high-rate processes. Information related to system design is fragmented and poorly documented. This paper seeks to address this issue by summarizing state-of-the art MBBR design procedures and providing the reader with an overview of some commercially available systems and their components.
31
A model of substrate utilization by bacterial films.
Kenneth Williamson, Perry L. McCarty · PubMed · 1976 · 366 citations