A comparative 3-month clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of a battery-operated and a rechargeable oscillating-rotating power toothbrush.

Abstract

No evidence was found of soft or hard tissue trauma and both brushes were considered to be safe when used according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 3 months, whole mouth plaque scores had decreased by 7% in the D8 group but had increased by 4.3% in the Actibrush group. The decrease from baseline in the D8 group was statistically significant, but the increase in the Actibrush group was not. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant both for the whole mouth and all individual sites. Whole mouth gingivitis scores were also reduced significantly from baseline in both groups, by 22.5% in the D8 group and by 17.5% in the Actibrush group. For whole mouth scores and all individual sites (interproximal, buccal and lingual), the D8 was significantly more effective than the Actibrush.