PubMed · 2006 · 40 citations · 5 references
DentistryDental Biomaterials ScienceDental Materials ScienceDental MaterialsMechanical Properties Of Dental MaterialsNanomaterialsComposite Resin RestorationsComposite ResinsDental CeramicsDental CompositesEnamel Mechanical PropertiesStrength PropertiesDiametral Tensile StrengthEnamel-dentin Mechanical PropertiesNanoceramic Dental CompositesNanocomposite Dental ResinsNanofilled Composite MaterialsNanofilled CompositesTensile StrengthTensile Strength Testing
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the mechanical behavior of five nanofilled composites with dentin and enamel shades trough diametral tensile strength and knoop microhardness. 4 Seasons (Ivoclar Vivadent), Esthet X improved (Dentsply), Filtek Supreme (3M), Grandio (Voco) and Palfique Estelite (Tokuyama Dental Corp.) were used in this research. Twenty samples (6 mm diameter and 3 mm thickness) of each material were used. Ten samples were submitted to knoop microhardness and the others to diametral tensile strength examinations. The results were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey statistical tests (a=0.05). There were significant differences between the tested groups (p<0.05). The diametral tensile strength ranged from 36.08 (4 Seansons dentin) to 49.24 (Grandio enamel). The knoop microhardness ranged from 54.45 (Esthet X improved enamel) to 123.90 (Grandio dentin). A great variability in the mechanical behavior of the nanofilled composites was observed. However it was not recorded with dentin and enamel shades with the exception of Grandio.
5
Américo Bortolazzo Correr, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Lourenço Correr Sobrinho et al. · Brazilian Dental Journal · 2005 · 83 citations · Full text
Dentistry, Dental Biomaterials Science, Dental Materials Science +16