PubMed · 1986 · 16 citations · 0 references
Veterinary MedicineCardiologyVeterinary Diagnostic ImagingBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCardiac AssessmentCardiac ImagingCardiovascular ImagingComputed TomographyCardiac Computed TomographyCardiac OutputCardiac Output VariabilityIodinated Contrast AgentsIodinated Contrast MediaThermodilution Cardiac OutputTomography
Three methods of determining cardiac output were compared in six anesthetized dogs (23-28 kg) for the purpose of evaluating the ability of ultrafast computed tomography to measure cardiac output at three points of the circulation: pulmonary artery, left ventricle, and descending aorta. Computed tomography cardiac output is calculated by indicator dilution analysis of an iodinated contrast bolus time-density curve. Computed tomography cardiac output was compared to thermodilution and radioactive microsphere cardiac output methods. The results show very good agreement between thermodilution and computed tomography methods (r = .90) and good agreement between microsphere and computed tomography (r = .88). Comparison of computed tomography cardiac output measurements from the left ventricle and pulmonary artery was excellent (r = .99), as were measurements from the left ventricle and descending aorta (r = .97). This study also showed minimal interlevel scan-density response variability (3%) and minimal variability between experiments (7%). Therefore, it is concluded that cardiac output can be accurately measured at many points in the blood pool by ultrafast computed tomography.