Perfusion · 2016 · 11 citations · 20 references
MedicineHematologySurgeryHemostasisInflammationVascular SurgeryCardiopulmonary BypassCoagulation AbnormalitiesCoronary Artery DiseaseExtracorporeal CirculationThrombosisThrombosis PreventionCoagulation BiomarkersFactor Viii ActivationInflammation-associated ThrombosisInflammatory Coagulation ResponseIntercellular Adhesion Molecule 1Perioperative Coagulation ManagementSystemic Inflammation Markers
BACKGROUND:: Supposedly, minimized extracorporeal circulation or off-pump revascularization as alternatives to conventional extracorporeal circulation (ONCAB) reduce inflammation and coagulation disturbances. METHODS:: One hundred and twenty coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients were prospectively randomized for three surgical techniques. Coagulation and inflammation markers were measured up to 72 hours postoperatively. RESULTS:: Coagulation factors I, II, V, X, antithrombin III and C-reactive protein did not differ perioperatively between the groups and increased, as did several other markers, 12 to 72 hours postoperatively. Compared to its alternatives, ONCAB showed the most obvious transient increase in thrombin-antithrombin complexes (p<0.0001), D-dimers (p=0.0059), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (p=0.0005), factor VIII (p=0.0041) and tumor necrosis factor α (p=0.0300) during the operation and up to 12 hours postoperatively. Furthermore, ONCAB generated lower leukocyte and platelet counts and higher values of soluble P-selectin and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 at some time points. CONCLUSIONS:: With similarity in pivot coagulation factors, a specific detrimental influence of ONCAB on common coagulation pathways was excluded. Higher perioperative concentrations of products from the coagulation cascade most likely indicate activation of pericardial blood - recirculated only in ONCAB. Furthermore, with only temporary differences in markers of inflammation, the alternatives to ONCAB altogether were without advantage at 72 hours postoperatively. In the general answer to surgical trauma, the part of modern extracorporeal circulation is possibly overestimated. The study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry. Registration number DRKS00007580. URL: https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/drks_web/ URL: http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/.
20
On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery
A. Laurie Shroyer, Frederick L. Grover, Brack Hattler et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2009 · 1.1K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +10
Off-Pump versus On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients
Anno Diegeler, Jochen Börgermann, Utz Kappert et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 512 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +8
Effects of Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting at 1 Year
André Lamy, P.J. Devereaux, Dorairaj Prabhakaran et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 447 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +12
Andrea Koenig, Karin E. Norgard-Sumnicht, Rorbert J. Linhardt et al. · Journal of Clinical Investigation · 1998 · 403 citations · Full text