Feasibility and tolerability of the addition of erlotinib to 3D thoracic radiotherapy (RT) in patients (p) with unresectable NSCLC: A prospective randomized phase II study

Eliana C. Martinez, M. Martinez, N. Viñolas, Francesc Casas, Antonio de la Torre, F. Valcárcel, J. Mínguez, Alfredo Paredes, A. Pérez Casas, Manuel Dómine

Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 19 citations · 0 references

Concepts

Abstract

7563 Background: RT is the standard treatment for p with unresectable or locally advanced NSCLC. Considering the high frequency of tumor recurrence it is necessary to improve the results of the RT by integrating regimens of chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies into current radiotherapy strategies. Erlotinib is an EGFR TKI that has shown activity in recurrent/metastatic NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the addition of erlotinib to RT in p with unresectable NSCLC. Methods: P with unresectable stage I-IIIA NSCLC not suitable to receive chemotherapy, ECOG ≤ 2, measurable disease by RECIST were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized phase II study. P included in arm A received 3D thoracic RT (66 Gy in 33 fractions during 6 weeks). P assigned to arm B were treated with 3D thoracic RT (66 Gy in 33 fractions during 6 weeks) and concomitant erlotinib 150 mg/day po maintained for 6 months. Primary endpoint is the percentage of grade 3–4 toxicities and secondary endpoints are PFS, time to treatment failure, OS and RR. Results: A total of 30 p have been randomized from March 06 to December 07. Data from 23 p have been included in this analysis (10 Arm A, 13 Arm B). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Esophagitis was observed in 4 p (40%) in arm A and 3 p (23%) in arm B, (no grade 3–4). Radiodermitis occurred in 5 p (50%) in arm A (no grade 3–4 observed) and in 1 p (8%) in arm B, being grade 3. Pneumonitis occurred in 2 p (20%) in arm A (10% grade 3) and 1 p (8%) in arm B (no grade 3–4 observed). Main toxicities related to erlotinib were skin rash (61.5%) and diarrhea (23%) being all cases mild to moderate. 15 p were evaluable for tumor response. Response rate in arm A was 55.5% and 83.3% in arm B. Disease progression is documented in 22.2% of p in arm A and 16.7% of p in arm B. Conclusions: Combination of erlotinib and RT seems to be an active treatment for this p population. The addition of erlotinib does not appear to increase in-field toxicities, being a feasible and well tolerated option for p with unresectable stage I-IIIA NSCLC. Data on survival will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.