Critical Arts · 2016 · 12 citations · 15 references
Social SciencesCultural StudiesFilm StudiesCultureMedia StudiesPopular Culture StudiesConsumer CultureFashionFilm GenresKorean StudiesNational CinemaNational Cinema TraditionsAristocratic FactionalismKorean CinemaKorean CultureKorean Popular CulturePolitical Economy Of CinemaPolitical Economy Of FilmSouth Korean Society
Let's parse. Background lines: 1. "AbstractSeveral socio-cultural outcomes of an elite nature are now attributable to neoliberalism and its various national incarnations: increased wealth concentration, debt of an extravagant nature, elevated status and the emulation of older aristocratic behaviour." 2. "This is unique to neoliberalism largely because of global media's endorsements of such upper-class lifestyles found in advertising, television and now cinema." Also [Background, Other] line: "These films and many others articulate a neoliberal sociality, essential to understand placations and critiques of elite culture offered up in a body of cinematic work referred to here as 'genres of neoliberalism', borrowed from Jane Elliott and Gillian Harkins." So background content: elite outcomes, wealth concentration, debt, status, emulation of aristocracy, global media endorsement of upper-class lifestyles in media and cinema, and the concept of 'genres of neoliberalism'. Purpose lines: - [Purpose, Mechanism] line: "In this article, my analysis of neoliberal culture is specific to post-IMF South Korea (2001–2015), a country that now possesses one of the most concentrated forms of free market capitalism and one of the most stratified class systems because of it." - [Purpose, Findings] line: "Drawing on how corporate greed, self-aggrandisement and fashion acquisition – even conglomerate culture and financial transactions – become tropes in contemporary Korean cinema, I argue that these themes are capable, on the one hand, of displaying white‑collar conformity, a nation seemingly comprised of smartly dressed entrepreneurs and service workers, whose corporate lifestyle innocently intersects with department store culture." - [Purpose, Mechanism] line: "Some foster the status quo while others critique it; yet they embody the contradictions of neoliberalism to marketise culture while others contest such marketisation in their narratives." So purpose: analyze neoliberal culture in post-IMF South Korea, focusing on tropes of corporate greed, self-aggrandisement, fashion acquisition, conglomerate culture, financial transactions in Korean cinema, to argue that these themes display white-collar conformity and also critique or support status quo.
AbstractSeveral socio-cultural outcomes of an elite nature are now attributable to neoliberalism and its various national incarnations: increased wealth concentration, debt of an extravagant nature, elevated status and the emulation of older aristocratic behaviour. This is unique to neoliberalism largely because of global media's endorsements of such upper-class lifestyles found in advertising, television and now cinema. In this article, my analysis of neoliberal culture is specific to post-IMF South Korea (2001–2015), a country that now possesses one of the most concentrated forms of free market capitalism and one of the most stratified class systems because of it. Drawing on how corporate greed, self-aggrandisement and fashion acquisition – even conglomerate culture and financial transactions – become tropes in contemporary Korean cinema, I argue that these themes are capable, on the one hand, of displaying white-collar conformity, a nation seemingly comprised of smartly dressed entrepreneurs and service workers, whose corporate lifestyle innocently intersects with department store culture. On the other hand, there appears an underlying social and material degeneracy. The films discussed here – Monopoly, The Taste of Money, The Day He Arrives and My Black Mini Dress – fall into a neoliberal genre because they are in the service of clueing, reinforcing, and sometimes denouncing decadent Korean lifestyles. Some foster the status quo while others critique it; yet they embody the contradictions of neoliberalism to marketise culture while others contest such marketisation in their narratives. These films and many others articulate a neoliberal sociality, essential to understand placations and critiques of elite culture offered up in a body of cinematic work referred to here as 'genres of neoliberalism', borrowed from Jane Elliott and Gillian Harkins.Keywords: consumptionextravagancegenres of neoliberalismneoliberal royaltySouth Korean cinemastatus Additional informationNotes on contributorsKeith B. WagnerKeith B. Wagner, PhD, Assistant Professor of Film Studies and Social Theory, Graduate School of Film and Digital Media, Hongik University, Seoul, South Korea. Keithbwagner@hotmail.com
15
Rosalind Gill, Andy C. Pratt · Theory Culture & Society · 2008 · 1.3K citations
Financialization of daily life
Choice Reviews Online · 2003 · 1.2K citations
Social Sciences, Economics, Finance +17