OncoImmunology · 2016 · 88 citations · 20 references
PharmacyOncologyPharmacotherapyCutaneous OncologyImmunotherapyOncology PharmacotherapyCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune-related Adverse EventsImmunotherapy SafetyUveal MelanomaDermatologic Adverse EventsMelanoma ImmunotherapyMetastatic Melanoma TreatmentMetastatic Uveal MelanomaPartial Response AssessmentPembrolizumab TherapyRecist CriteriaUveal Melanoma Metastasis
BACKGROUND: Untreated metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) carries a grave prognosis. Unlike cutaneous melanoma (CM), there are no established treatments known to significantly improve outcomes for a meaningful proportion of patients. Inhibition of the PD1-PDL1 axis has shown promise in the management of CM and we here report a two center experience of UM patients receiving pembrolizumab. METHODS: To assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, we retrospectively analyzed outcome data of 25 consecutive UM patients participating in the MK3475 expanded access program (EAP) who received pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg 3 weekly. Tumor assessment was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and immune-related Response Criteria (irRC) by CT scanning. Toxicity was recorded utilizing Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ("CTCAE") v4.03. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified receiving a median of six cycles of treatment. Two patients achieved a partial response and six patients stable disease. After a median follow-up of 225 d median progression free survival (PFS) was 91 d and overall survival (OS) was not reached. There was a significant trend for improved outcomes in patients with extrahepatic disease progression as opposed to liver only progression at the outset. Five patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs); there were no treatment related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab 2mg/kg q3w is a safe option in UM patients. Disease control rates, particularly in the subgroup of patients without progressive liver disease at the outset are promising; these results merit further investigation in clinical trials possibly incorporating liver targeted treatment modalities.
20
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
F. Stephen Hodi, Steven O’Day, David F. McDermott et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 15.2K citations · Full text
Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer
Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Serena Nik‐Zainal, David C. Wedge et al. · Nature · 2013 · 10.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +14
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
James Larkin, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.1K citations · Full text
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Caroline Robert, Jacob Schachter, Georgina V. Long et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 5.8K citations · Full text