Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2016 · 138 citations · 35 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryOrthopedic BiomechanicsOrthopedic RehabilitationOrthopedicsFunctional Capacity AssessmentKnee BiomechanicsKnee RehabilitationLigament ReconstructionLower Extremity Function AssessmentMuscle Strength TestingAccuracyBilateral Strength TestingBiomechanics Of Ligament ReconstructionKnee Function AssessmentKnee Joint AssessmentLigament Reconstruction AssessmentLimb Symmetry AssessmentQuadriceps Strength Testing
INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: Quadriceps strength is a useful clinical predictor of self-reported function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it remains unknown if quadriceps strength normalized to body mass (QBM) or quadriceps strength limb symmetry index (QLSI) is the best predictor of self-reported function in individuals with ACLR. We sought to determine whether QBM and QLSI are able to predict individuals with ACLR who self-report high function (≥90% on the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) index). METHODS: Ninety-six individuals with a history of a primary unilateral ACLR were recruited for a multisite cross-sectional descriptive laboratory experiment. Bilateral isometric quadriceps strength was collected at 90° of knee flexion to calculate QBM and QLSI (ratio of the ACLR limb to the contralateral limb). Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to determine the capacity of QBM and QLSI to predict individuals with high self-reported function on the IKDC index. RESULTS: QBM displayed high accuracy (AUC = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.86) for identifying participants with an IKDC index ≥90%. A QBM cutoff score of 3.10 N·m·kg was found to maximize sensitivity (0.61) and specificity (0.84), and displayed 8.15 (3.09-21.55) times higher odds of reporting high function. QLSI displayed a moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.62, 0.50-0.73) for identifying participants with an IKDC index ≥90%. A QLSI cutoff score of 96.5% maximized sensitivity (0.55) and specificity (0.70), and represented 2.78 (1.16-6.64) times higher odds reporting high function. CONCLUSION: QBM is a stronger predictor of high self-reported function compared with QLSI in individuals with ACLR. Rehabilitation guidelines may benefit from incorporating the use of QBM measurements for the purpose of predicting participants that may maintain high self-reported function.
35
Karen K. Briggs, Jack Lysholm, Yelverton Tegner et al. · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2009 · 913 citations
Laura C. Schmitt, Mark V. Paterno, Timothy E. Hewett · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · 2012 · 452 citations