Publication | Closed Access
The relationship of myocardial infarct size and prognosis.
79
Citations
0
References
1976
Year
Heart FailureSlow-onset ShockCoronary Artery DiseaseAcute Myocardial InfarctionThrombosisStrokeSepsisPublic HealthAtherosclerosisCardiologyMyocardial InfarctionCardiovascular EpidemiologyMyocardial Infarct SizeTraumatic Cardiac ArrestEpidemiologyCardiac ArrestCardiogenic ShockCardiovascular DiseaseCollateral FlowMedicineEmergency Medicine
Patients with cardiogenic shock were arbitrarily divided into groups, those in whom shock appeared within 6 hours after the onset of acute infarction and those in whom the symptoms appeared more than 6 hours after the onset of acute infarction. The patients with more rapidly developing shock had larger areas of necrosis (average 48%) than the slow-onset group (average 28%). The former group had more sites of total occlusion of the epicardial arteries (3.5 vs 1.6) than the slow-onset group. By postmortem X-ray examination less collateral flow was visible in the rapid-onset shock patients than the slow-onset ones. These observations suggest that slow-onset shock is more likely to respond to presently available therapeutic interventions than the cases with rapid-onset shock.