Multinational Home Use of Closed-Loop Control Is Safe and Effective

Stacey M. Anderson, Dan Raghinaru, Jordan E. Pinsker, Federico Boscari, Éric Renard, Bruce A. Buckingham, Revital Nimri, Francis J. Doyle, Sue A. Brown, Patrick Keith-Hynes,

Diabetes Care · 2016 · 118 citations · 19 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study assessed whether the portable, wearable, wireless artificial pancreas system (DiAs) could improve overnight‑only and 24/7 closed‑loop glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes. Thirty adults with type 1 diabetes across six centers in four countries underwent a 2‑week baseline sensor‑augmented pump period followed by 2 weeks of overnight‑only closed‑loop control and 2 weeks of 24/7 closed‑loop control at home, with glucose metrics compared to baseline. Closed‑loop control reduced hypoglycemia, increased time in target range, and lowered glucose variability compared to baseline, with 24/7 control providing additional daytime hypoglycemia protection and overall demonstrating safety and effectiveness.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of a portable, wearable, wireless artificial pancreas system (the Diabetes Assistant [DiAs] running the Unified Safety System) on glucose control at home in overnight-only and 24/7 closed-loop control (CLC) modes in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS At six clinical centers in four countries, 30 participants 18–66 years old with type 1 diabetes (43% female, 96% non-Hispanic white, median type 1 diabetes duration 19 years, median A1C 7.3%) completed the study. The protocol included a 2-week baseline sensor-augmented pump (SAP) period followed by 2 weeks of overnight-only CLC and 2 weeks of 24/7 CLC at home. Glucose control during CLC was compared with the baseline SAP. RESULTS Glycemic control parameters for overnight-only CLC were improved during the nighttime period compared with baseline for hypoglycemia (time <70 mg/dL, primary end point median 1.1% vs. 3.0%; P < 0.001), time in target (70–180 mg/dL: 75% vs. 61%; P < 0.001), and glucose variability (coefficient of variation: 30% vs. 36%; P < 0.001). Similar improvements for day/night combined were observed with 24/7 CLC compared with baseline: 1.7% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001; 73% vs. 65%, P < 0.001; and 34% vs. 38%, P < 0.001, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CLC running on a smartphone (DiAs) in the home environment was safe and effective. Overnight-only CLC reduced hypoglycemia and increased time in range overnight and increased time in range during the day; 24/7 CLC reduced hypoglycemia and increased time in range both overnight and during the day. Compared with overnight-only CLC, 24/7 CLC provided additional hypoglycemia protection during the day.

References

19