Publication | Closed Access
Are Reactive Oxygen Species Generated in Electrospray at Low Currents?
34
Citations
34
References
2014
Year
Environmental ElectrochemistryBioelectrochemistryChemistryLow CurrentsReactive Oxygen SpeciesRedox BiologyOxidative StressElectrosprayed UreaseAnalytical ChemistryJack Bean UreaseElectrolyzed WaterHealth SciencesBiochemistryPhotochemistryReactive Oxygen SpecieElectrochemistryPhysiologyElectrosynthesisElectrophysiologyWater ElectrolysisMedicineHydrogen PeroxideElectrolysis Of Water
It was demonstrated that electrospraying (ES) of solvents from a glass capillary proceeds without emission of light provided that the current is kept below a certain critical level (<100 nA at positive potential and <25 nA at negative potential for 96% ethanol; < 40 nA at positive potential for water). Though the onset of corona, as detected by the appearance of light, was always accompanied by a break in the current-voltage slope, such breaks also happened before the onset of corona, so they cannot be used as an adequate indicator of corona ignition. Of four ROS studied (hydrogen peroxide, ozone, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide anions), only H2O2 and ozone were found to be generated at a current of 150-200 nA in detectable quantities: with a yield of 0.5-1 H2O2 molecules per electron at positive potential and 1.5-3 at negative potential. Despite the low yield of the ROS, jack bean urease was shown to be inactivated when the enzyme solution with a concentration below 20 μg/mL was electrosprayed at a current of 200 nA. Addition of 0.1 mM EDTA totally protected the activity of the electrosprayed urease.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1