Balkan Medical Journal · 2017 · 20 citations · 22 references
Life SciencesPharmacologySurgeryCell AdhesionDrug DeliveryWound HealingCell-cell AdhesionFocal AdhesionsAbdominal AdhesionsAdhesionsControl Group DesignHistopathological DiagnosisMatched Control GroupPostoperative Adhesion FormationPostoperative Adhesion Prevention
BACKGROUND: Intraabdominal adhesions remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, intraabdominal adhesions can develop in more than 50% of abdominal operations. AIMS: We compared the anti-adhesive effects of two different agents on postoperative adhesion formation in a cecal abrasion model. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental animal study. METHODS: Forty Wistar albino type female rats were anesthetized and underwent laparotomy. Study groups comprised Sham, Control, Mitomycin-C, 4% Icodextrin, and Mitomycin-C +4% Icodextrin groups. Macroscopic and histopathological evaluations of adhesions were performed. RESULTS: The frequencies of moderate and severe adhesions were significantly higher in the control group than the other groups. The mitomycin-C and Mitomycin-C +4% Icodextrin groups were associated with significantly lower adhesion scores compared to the control group and 4% Icodextrin group scores (p=0.002 and p=0.008, respectively). The adhesion scores of the Mitomycin-C group were also significantly lower than those of the 4% Icodextrin group (p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Despite its potential for bone marrow toxicity, Mitomycin-C seems to effectively prevent adhesions. Further studies that prove an acceptable safety profile relating to this promising anti-adhesive agent are required before moving into clinical trials.
22
Biochemical events in peritoneal tissue repair.
G S diZerega · PubMed · 1997 · 205 citations
Medicine, Surgery, Cell Adhesion +12
[Pathophysiology and classification of adhesions].
H Zühlke, V. Savvas · PubMed · 1990 · 198 citations
Medicine, Cell Biology, Pathology +14