British Journal of Cancer · 2016 · 137 citations · 29 references
MedicineOncologyPreventive MedicineCancer ScreeningRisk AssessmentRisk PerceptionBreast Cancer Risk AssessmentPerceived RiskPopulation ScreeningRisk AttitudesRisk EstimationScreeningBreast Cancer Risk StratificationBreast Risk AssessmentCancer Risk CommunicationMammographic Breast Density AssessmentMammographic DensityPopulation Risk-based ScreeningRisk-based Cancer ScreeningScreening Risk Stratification
INTRODUCTION: There are widespread moves to develop risk-stratified approaches to population-based breast screening. The public needs to favour receiving breast cancer risk information, which ideally should produce no detrimental effects. This study investigates risk perception, the proportion wishing to know their 10-year risk and whether subsequent screening attendance is affected. METHODS: Fifty thousand women attending the NHS Breast Screening Programme completed a risk assessment questionnaire. Ten-year breast cancer risks were estimated using a validated algorithm (Tyrer-Cuzick) adjusted for visually assessed mammographic density. Women at high risk (⩾8%) and low risk (<1%) were invited for face-to-face or telephone risk feedback and counselling. RESULTS: Of those invited to receive risk feedback, more high-risk women, 500 out of 673 (74.3%), opted to receive a consultation than low-risk women, 106 out of 193 (54.9%) (P<0.001). Women at high risk were significantly more likely to perceive their risk as high (P<0.001) and to attend their subsequent mammogram (94.4%) compared with low-risk women (84.2%; P=0.04) and all attendees (84.3%; ⩽0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Population-based assessment of breast cancer risk is feasible. The majority of women wished to receive risk information. Perception of general population breast cancer risk is poor. There were no apparent adverse effects on screening attendance for high-risk women whose subsequent screening attendance was increased.
29
Ahmedin Jemal, Freddie Bray, Jacques Ferlay et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2011 · 55K citations · Full text
Global Cancer Statistics, 2002
Donald Maxwell Parkin, Freddie Bray, Jacques Ferlay et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2005 · 18.4K citations · Full text
Comparative analysis of two rates
Olli S. Miettinen, Markku Nurminen · Statistics in Medicine · 1985 · 1.1K citations