Publication | Open Access
Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions
811
Citations
55
References
2014
Year
Compliance CostsPolicy ScienceEngineeringPolitical BehaviorAdministrative BurdenPublic Personnel AdministrationPolicy AnalysisSocial SciencesBureaucracyGovernmental ProcessPolicy ProcessPublic PolicyCompliance ManagementTheoretical ContributionsSocial ImpactPolicy PerspectiveSocial PolicyAdministrative ProcessPolitical Science
The opaque nature of administrative burdens may facilitate their use as forms of hidden politics, enabling significant policy changes without broad political consideration. This article develops the concept of administrative burden and argues that it serves as a political tool, concluding with a research agenda on its implications. Administrative burden is defined as a function of learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen–state interactions and is illustrated through an analysis of Wisconsin Medicaid policy evolution. Across three Wisconsin governorships, burden levels shifted in line with each governor’s political philosophy, with federal actors playing a secondary but important role.
This article offers two theoretical contributions. First, we develop the concept of administrative burden as an important variable in understanding how citizens experience the state. Administrative burden is conceptualized as a function of learning, psychological, and compliance costs that citizens experience in their interactions with government. Second, we argue that administrative burden is a venue of politics, that is, the level of administrative burden placed on an individual, as well as the distribution of burden between the state and the individual, will often be a function of deliberate political choice rather than simply a product of historical accident or neglect. The opaque nature of administrative burdens may facilitate their use as forms of “hidden politics,” where significant policy changes occur without broad political consideration. We illustrate this argument via an analysis of the evolution of Medicaid policies in the state of Wisconsin. Across three Governorships, the level of burden evolved in ways consistent with the differing political philosophies of each Governor, with federal actors playing a secondary but important role in shaping burden in this intergovernmental program. We conclude by sketching a research agenda centered on administrative burden.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1