2010 · 18 citations · 28 references
EngineeringElectrical EngineeringAcousticsInstrumentationTime Series AnalysisData Acquisition SystemsData ReductionDigital Signal ProcessingSignal ProcessingBlind Signal SeparationDenoisingDigital DenoisingInterference EstimationInterference In Field RecordingsNoise EstimationSignal DeconvolutionSignal Separation
Conventional data acquisition practice dictates the existence of sufficient time intervals between the firing of successive sources in the field. However, much attention has been drawn recently to the possibility of shooting in an overlapping fashion. Numerous publications have addressed the issue from different scopes (denoising, compressing, blind signal separation etc.) while others have defined the theoretical background. The term ‘blending’ was introduced to describe this new trend in acquisition designs, the time‐overlapping data acquisition. In turn, the term ‘deblending’ refers to an algorithm that recovers the data as if they were shot in the conventional way. Such an algorithm is presented in this chapter for application on both impulsive and vibrating sources. This algorithm is based on iterative interference estimation and subtraction and is applied to field data.
28
SEMBLANCE AND OTHER COHERENCY MEASURES FOR MULTICHANNEL DATA
Norman S. Neidell, M. Turhan Taner · Geophysics · 1971 · 846 citations
Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition
A. J. “Guus” Berkhout · The Leading Edge · 2008 · 371 citations
Phase encoding of shot records in prestack migration
Louis A. Romero, Dennis C. Ghiglia, Curtis Ober et al. · Geophysics · 1999 · 305 citations
A new look at simultaneous sources
Craig J. Beasley, Ronald E. Chambers, Zerong Jiang · 1998 · 227 citations