Law & Society Review · 1977 · 128 citations · 19 references
MedicinePsychiatryAdult PsychiatryDuty Of CareMental Health LawInvoluntary CommitmentInvoluntary HospitalizationMental IllnessDisorderInvoluntary Commitment CriteriaInvoluntary Hospitalization CriteriaInvoluntary Psychiatric CommitmentPetition AdjudicationPetition LawPetition ParticipationState Habeas Corpus
One hundred persons who were committed involuntarily to mental hospitals on 72-hour holds under California's Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (1967), and who filed writs of habeas corpus, were observed during petition hearings. Involuntary commitment criteria were frequently “bargained down” from dangerous to others, dangerous to self, and gravely disabled during the 72-hour hold to gravely disabled at the petition hearing. Most frequently used criteria for continued hospitalization as gravely disabled included prior hospitalization, refusal to take medication, and failure to cooperate with the hospital system. Persons adjudged dangeros to self were generally suicidal in action or talk. Although a minority of persons judged at the petition hearing to be dangerous to others were assaultive or threatening, evidence for the imminence and seriousness of dangerousness was not offered.
19
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Bioethics · 1992 · 1.1K citations
Public Health, Health Sciences, Social Determinants Of Health +1
D. Stafford‐Clark, Thomas Szasz · The Yale Law Journal · 1964 · 364 citations
Law, Jurisprudence, Psychiatry +10
MENTAL HEALTH AND LAW: A SYSTEM IN TRANSITION
Dana L. Farnsworth · Psychiatric Annals · 1975 · 112 citations
Law, Health Law, Public Law +8