Publication | Closed Access
A Hybrid Lattice-Boltzmann/FH-W Method to Predict Sources and Propagation of Landing Gear Noise
34
Citations
14
References
2010
Year
Unknown Venue
AeroacousticsEngineering Noise ControlEngineeringNose Landing GearAtmospheric AcousticNear FieldEngineering AcousticNumerical SimulationNoiseSystems EngineeringModeling And SimulationSound PropagationLanding GearPredict SourcesGear NoiseHybrid Lattice-boltzmann/fh-w MethodSignal ProcessingAerospace EngineeringHydrodynamicsAerodynamicsFar-field Hydrodynamics
A hybrid approach to predict the far-field noise generated by an airplane nose landing gear is presented in this paper. The approach consists of a Lattice-Boltzmann Method (LBM) for the calculation of the flow-field around the fully detailed geometry of the landing gear which provides the input for a Ffowcs Williams – Hawkings (FW-H) solver to calculate the far-field noise. Both parts have been validated independently. The method is applied to the nose landing gear of a Gulfstream G550 business jet, for comparison with experimental results obtained in the University of Florida UFAFF wind tunnel. The near-field flow simulation using the LBM method showed good correlation with the PIV measurements of the flow field as well as surface microphone measurements, up to frequencies of about 4kHz. The comparison to experimental far-field results shows good agreement in the midfrequency range of 1-3kHz. At both low and high frequencies the simulations underpredict the measured results more strongly than the near field and surface measurements would suggest, which may be due to experimental limitations. A comparison between the solid and porous formulation of the FW-H solver shows that both method provide nearly equivalent results. However, inclusion of additional surfaces such as part of the fuselage is critical to achieving good results with the solid formulation. The effects of resolution of the near-field simulations are also investigated and show the expected lower cut-off frequency for lower resolutions for both the near-field and the far-field. No differences between the cases with different resolutions are observed up to 1 kHz in the near-field and up 2-3kHz in the farfield.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1