1c:I[419806,["/_next/static/chunks/bb923814e1f4d2e9.js","/_next/static/chunks/dd3ee9f5b7716ca6.js","/_next/static/chunks/4204a0ae82542ca8.js","/_next/static/chunks/30036bedc5269936.js","/_next/static/chunks/6e1aa89a642f40be.js","/_next/static/chunks/cd5e572bc3e4eb92.js","/_next/static/chunks/8ffd0b71567920d8.js","/_next/static/chunks/67ea6dfd21f16c5f.js","/_next/static/chunks/24eb4379f68013fd.js","/_next/static/chunks/b8cd775ffdf935bd.js","/_next/static/chunks/983103cd9eb7b428.js","/_next/static/chunks/d4ac9dcf27f6ff52.js","/_next/static/chunks/294b9525248c8e5f.js"],"default"] 1d:T495,Twenty-eight patients with 32 meningiomas were studied on a 0.5-T superconductive magnetic resonance (MR) imager. This common, benign treatable tumor was more clearly seen on computed tomography (CT) than MRI in 53% of cases. This is a result of poor contrast between the tumor and the adjacent brain on all spin-echo and inversion-recovery pulse sequences. Those sequences that provide the greatest anatomic detail were best for identifying this low-contrast lesion. Inversion-recovery scans in particular demonstrated the tumor as a discrete hypointense mass (relative to nearby white matter) with excellent visualization of the dural base and white matter buckling indicative of extracerebral mass effect. Other characteristic features include: a hypointense rim because of the venous capsule (66%); mottling due to hypervascularity; a well defined edema collar that demarcates the tumor from adjacent brain; and hyperostosis with thickening of the calvaria and obliteration of its normal landmarks. MRI did not demonstrate tumor calcification but did demonstrate vascular encasement, displacement, and occlusion better than CT and as well as digital venous angiography.1e:T420,NEUROGENIC tumors occurring primarily in the nose and the throat are rare, and there are probably few other tumors about which there is so much confusion in the literature. When a neurogenic tumor is encountered, and this is usually unexpectedly, one may be at a loss to know what to do, even though most of them are amenable to successful surgical correction or removal. Any tumor derived from nerve tissue or its coverings may be considered a neurogenic tumor. Neurogenic tumors of the nose or the throat may be divided into two large groups consisting of, first, developmental errors and, second, neoplasms. The developmental errors are meningocele, encephalocele and hydroencephalocele. In the literature these have been called sincipital¹or basal hernias,²encephaloma,³rhinoencephalocele,⁴glioma,⁵fibroglioma⁶and neurocytoma.⁷They are most frequently referred to as meningocele and encephalocele or sincipital or basal hernias. These three conditions have in common a defect1f:T409,MR imaging and CT (with and without contrast enhancement) were performed in 20 patients with an established or clinically suspected diagnosis of craniopharyngioma. Fifteen had biopsy-proven craniopharyngioma and five had presumed craniopharyngioma based on clinical and CT findings. In two cases MR was superior to contrast-enhanced CT in demonstrating the tumor. A variable appearance on T1-weighted MR images reflected the pathologic appearance of craniopharyngiomas. High intensity on T1-weighted images corresponded to high cholesterol content or presence of methemoglobin. MR was the preferred method in the evaluation of tumor extent, especially in the cavernous sinus and posterior clival region. CT was superior to MR in detecting the presence of calcification, which with the clinical history correctly suggested the diagnosis of craniopharyngioma. Both MR and CT studies are desired initially to establish the diagnosis and to evaluate tumor extent. MR was the preferred method in detecting the presence of recurrent tumor.

	Year	Citations

References