Journal of Applied Ecology · 1983 · 211 citations · 11 references
Life SciencesEcologyMarine SciencesFish BiologyFish EcologyMarine EcologyMarine Community EcologyMarine Fish BiologyMarine Species DiversityReef Fish EcologySpecies DiversitySpecies RichnessAbundance Data AnalysisDepth-related Diversity GradientsDepth-related Diversity PatternsFish Assemblage DynamicsFishing Pressure EffectsReef Fish AssemblagesRelative Abundance MetricsSpecies Richness Estimators
Depth preferences of reef fish are thought to be driven by feeding requirements. The authors conducted a visual scuba‑diving census of conspicuous fish abundance and size classes across two depth ranges inside and outside a marine reserve to assess the effects of depth and fishing restrictions. The assemblage comprised 35 species dominated by Labridae and Sparidae, with no significant difference in species richness or Shannon diversity between sites, but ordination revealed that depth and reserve status strongly influenced species occurrence and abundance; reserve sites harbored higher densities and larger modal size classes of vulnerable species, indicating that reduced fishing pressure effectively protects these species.
SUMMARY (1) A visual scuba diving census, in which abundance and size class structure of conspicuous fish species were determined, was used to assess the effects of depth and marine reserve fishing restrictions on the structure of a Mediterranean rocky reef fish assemblage by comparing communities at sites from two depth ranges inside and outside a marine reserve. (2) The total assemblage had thirty-five conspicuous species and was dominated by Labridae (thirteen spp.) and Sparidae (nine spp.). (3) Mean species richness (number of species) and diversity (Shannon) did not differ significantly between sites. (4) Ordination of abundance data showed that occurrence and relative abundance of species was affected by depth (deep samples separated completely from shallow samples) and marine reserve status (samples from the marine reserve were significantly separated from those taken at the same depth outside the reserve). (5) Samples from the same depth were similar, because the majority of species showed a preference for either deep or shallow areas. The known biology of several species indicated that feeding requirements may be responsible for depth preferences. (6) Samples from reserve sites had signficantly higher densities of fish species sought after and/or vulnerable to local fishing methods, than those from non-reserve sites of similar depth. (7) Size frequency distributions of vulnerable species at reserve sites generally had a larger modal size class than distributions from non-reserve sites. (8) The data suggest that reduced fishing pressure in the reserve has provided effective protection for species vulnerable to fishing.
11
Shannon's Formula as a Measure of Specific Diversity: Its Use and Misuse
E. C. Pielou · The American Naturalist · 1966 · 812 citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +12
Growth and Ecology of Fish Populations
W. P. Williams, A. H. Weatherley · Journal of Animal Ecology · 1973 · 468 citations