American Journal of Political Science · 1999 · 316 citations · 23 references
Social SciencesPolitical ScienceAmerican PoliticsJudicial PoliticsPublic Choice TheoryJudicial DiscretionJudicial InstitutionsInstitutional Constraints On CourtsInstitutional Constraints On The ExecutiveJudicial Behavior Under ConstraintsJudicial NominationsPresidential NominationsSupreme Court Nomination
When a vacancy occurs on the Supreme Court, the president can strategically use his nomination power to align the Court with his policy preferences, but he faces constraints from existing justices, the Court median, and Senate approval. The paper develops and tests a theory examining the conditions under which a president is constrained in his choice of a nominee. The theory is tested using empirical analysis of Supreme Court nominations to assess strategic behavior. Our results show that presidents can, and do, behave strategically with respect to Supreme Court nominations.
When a vacancy occurs on the Supreme Court, the president can attempt to use his power of nomination strategically in order to bring the Court in line with his own policy preferences. However, the president faces two constraints when attempting to do so. First, he may be constrained by the presence of continuing justices and the existing Court median. Second, he may be constrained by the Senate, which must approve his nominee. In this paper we develop and test a theory that examines the conditions under which a president is constrained in his choice of a nominee. Our results show that presidents can, and do, behave strategically with respect to Supreme Court nominations.
23
Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock
Keith Krehbiel · Journal of Theoretical Politics · 1996 · 241 citations