American Antiquity · 1980 · 15 citations · 5 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesGeophysicsGeoarchaeologyGeomagnetismStratigraphyArchaeological GeophysicsRock MagnetismSecular VariationArchaeomagnetic DatingGeomagnetic Secular VariationIsotopic DatingMagnetic Secular VariationMaster Curve ConstructionPilot Study DesignSystematic Uncertainties
Although archaeomagnetic dating seems straightforward in principle, there are practical limitations which are not generally understood. Unlike rate-dependent processes such as isotopic dating, archaeomagnetic dating requires the construction of a master record of geomagnetic secular variation. Error is inherent in such a master curve due to statistical uncertainties regarding both the magnetic directions and ages of the samples used to create the curve. The master curve itself is thus best represented as a ribbon rather than a line. Features being dated have their own error of measurement of magnetic direction, and deriving a date involves an interpretation based on the relation between the oval of confidence for the unknown and the ribbon representing the master curve. Thus a practical precision limit for archaeomagnetic dating is about ± 20 years under optimal circumstances, but the limit will generally be higher. Our pilot study revealed no major discrepancies between our work and the curves of DuBois (1975).
5
Dating Techniques for the Archaeologist
William A. Longacre, H. Michaels, Elizabeth Ralph et al. · The Journal of Interdisciplinary History · 1975 · 67 citations
Humanities, Archaeology, Geology +10