Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium

TLDR

Chernobyl and Fukushima spurred interest in environmental radiation protection, yet laboratory and field studies of ionizing radiation effects remain contradictory, leading to disagreement on risk assessment implications. This paper reports the outcomes of a 2015 consensus symposium organized by the International Union of Radioecology. The symposium convened 30 diverse scientists to examine debated ecological impacts of radiation, focusing on laboratory versus field approaches, organism versus population inference, dose estimation, and chronic exposure significance. The participants produced seven consensus statements and recommendations aimed at reconciling discrepancies, guiding future research, and improving environmental radiological protection.

Abstract

This paper reports the output of a consensus symposium organized by the International Union of Radioecology in November 2015. The symposium gathered an academically diverse group of 30 scientists to consider the still debated ecological impact of radiation on populations and ecosystems. Stimulated by the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters' accidental contamination of the environment, there is increasing interest in developing environmental radiation protection frameworks. Scientific research conducted in a variety of laboratory and field settings has improved our knowledge of the effects of ionizing radiation on the environment. However, the results from such studies sometimes appear contradictory and there is disagreement about the implications for risk assessment. The Symposium discussions therefore focused on issues that might lead to different interpretations of the results, such as laboratory versus field approaches, organism versus population and ecosystemic inference strategies, dose estimation approaches and their significance under chronic exposure conditions. The participating scientists, from across the spectrum of disciplines and research areas, extending also beyond the traditional radioecology community, successfully developed a constructive spirit directed at understanding discrepancies. From the discussions, the group has derived seven consensus statements related to environmental protection against radiation, which are supplemented with some recommendations. Each of these statements is contextualized and discussed in view of contributing to the orientation and integration of future research, the results of which should yield better consensus on the ecological impact of radiation and consolidate suitable approaches for efficient radiological protection of the environment.